Annotator
Annotate a sample post
No install, no account. The posts are invented, and nothing you do here is saved.
x.com/home
- Step 1: Click the
- Step 2: Answer the questions
- Step 3: Submit
Home
For youFollowing
Example User@riverside_runs · 2h
Just finished the 10k along the river. Legs gone, mood great. Who else ran this morning?
Example User@fax_no_more · 4h
Anyone still running an office on fax machines in 2026 should not be allowed near a computer. Looking at you, dentist's reception.
Example User@citydesk_reader · 6h
Replying to @citydesk
Quoting this so everyone sees what that account said before it gets deleted. This is exactly the kind of thing the new policy is supposed to stop.
This post is unavailable.
Your dataset0 rows
| post_id | post_text | opinion | tone | evidence | note | annotator | submitted_at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submit an annotation to see its export row. | |||||||
The same columns the workspace exports, with your name in place of “you”. Nothing here is saved.
- 1
Answer Yes
Two more questions appear only when they apply. That's a conditional question, the kind leads build in the schema editor.
- 2
Click words in the post
Highlighting marks the evidence. In the extension the same thing works on any page.
- 3
Submit, then undo
Five seconds to change your mind, then a badge on the post and a row in your dataset.
Explore the rest of the workflow
Everything after Submit, on sample data. Nothing is saved.
Write the questions your team answers
Leads build a schema from seven question types. A question can depend on an earlier answer, and every save is a new version.
- Add questions from the palette
- Edit a question in the inspector
- Preview it before anyone uses it
chrome-extension://…/planning.html#schemas
Sample schema version 1
Add a question
Questions
Details
Type: yes/no
A second opinion, never a decision
The magnifier asks an AI to explain a post. Pre-annotate adds its suggested answers to your Compare view.
- You're asked before a read is spent
- Suggestions never fill the form
- Every label is still a person's
x.com/…/status/…
Example User@fax_no_more
Anyone still running an office on fax machines in 2026 should not be allowed near a computer. Looking at you, dentist's reception.
← the magnifier, beside the Annotate button
Hand a post to an annotator
Not sure, or not trained in the labels? Flag it with a note. It lands in your team's queue and clears itself once someone annotates it.
- Anyone with an account can flag
- Your flagged list shows who picked it up
- The flag links back to the post
x.com/…/status/…
Example User@citydesk_reader
Quoting this so everyone sees what that account said before it gets deleted. This is exactly the kind of thing the new policy is supposed to stop.
← what a flag-only account sees instead of Annotate
A lead checks every label
Submissions wait in the Review inbox. Approving one is the moment it becomes research data.
- Approve it, or send it back with a note
- The annotator sees the note in their History
- Nothing reaches the dataset unreviewed
chrome-extension://…/planning.html#review
Review 3 pending
- Example Annotator A· 12 min agoPending
Anyone still running an office on fax machines in 2026 should not be allowed near a computer. Looking at you, dentist's reception.
- opinion: yes
- tone: Joking
- evidence: fax machines; not be allowed
- Example Annotator B· 40 min agoPending
Just finished the 10k along the river. Legs gone, mood great. Who else ran this morning?
- opinion: no
- Example Annotator A· 2 h agoPending
Mostly zoning, rent and foot traffic. Older street grids were laid out before cars, so shops sit within walking distance of homes; newer suburbs zoned retail into separate plazas. Rent decides who can afford a small storefront, and foot traffic decides whether it survives.
- opinion: no
Settle a disagreement
When two annotators answer differently, the Conflicts page puts the answers side by side with agreement scores.
- Differing answers are highlighted
- Choose one, or file it away
- Both answers are kept; the loser reads Not chosen
chrome-extension://…/planning.html#conflicts
Conflicts 1 open
Quoting this so everyone sees what that account said before it gets deleted. This is exactly the kind of thing the new policy is supposed to stop.
| Question | Example Annotator A | Example Annotator B |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Yes | Yes |
| Tone | Critical (differs) | Neutral (differs) |
| Highlighted words | supposed to stop (differs) | before it gets deleted (differs) |
Agreement on this project: Cohen's κ 0.71 · measured on first answers, so settling doesn't rewrite it.
Get the data out, on your terms
Download the list in front of you, turn it into a standing delivery, or mint an export-only API token for your scripts.
- Workbook, CSV or JSON
- Scheduled exports arrive by email
- Tokens are export-only
chrome-extension://…/planning.html#items
Items 3 rows · Playground project
Schedules
None yet. Use the caret beside Export.
API tokens
Now do it on a real post
The same panel, on any website, with your own questions.
Free. Set up in about two minutes.